
The habits that worked on older AI can make Claude's most powerful model worse. Here's what to do instead — with the exact words to copy.
Don't tell Claude every step. Tell it what you want and how you'll know it's good— then let it work out the steps.
It gets better the harder the task. Say why you're doing it, then let it plan.
And don't ask to see its hidden thinking — that one can backfire.
An animated explainer of the same guide, in about 24 seconds.
Don't hand it the steps. Hand it the goal.
With older AI, good prompting meant moreinstruction — long checklists, “do it step by step,” spelled-out rules. That filled in what weaker models couldn't do on their own.
This model can do it. Anthropic's own guide says prompts written for older models are often too bossynow — the extra hand-holding gets in the way. The new skill is naming the goal, why it matters, and how you'll know it's good. Then it finds the steps.
This model gets better the harder the task. Bring the thing you've been putting off because it felt too big.
Give it the reason. This is the pattern from the official guide:
I'm working on [larger task] for [who it's for]. They need [what the output enables]. With that in mind: [request]The step-by-step you'd write for a weaker model actually makes this one's work worse. It finds the path better than you can describe it.
Give it the test you'll judge it by:
Good enough that I could hand it to my accountant without explaining anything.If you're just thinking out loud, say so. One line does it:
The deliverable is your assessment. Report findings and stop. Don't fix anything until I ask.Make the plan the first thing it gives you:
Scope this, ask me clarifying questions, then execute.In Anthropic's testing this line nearly stopped made-up status reports:
Before reporting progress, audit each claim against actual evidence. Only report work you can point to evidence for; if something isn't verified, say so.Make it re-check its own finish line:
When you think you're done, verify your work against the success criteria as if you were a skeptical reviewer seeing it for the first time.Left alone, it lists every option. Steer it:
If you're weighing a choice, give a recommendation, not an exhaustive survey.Asking to see its private reasoning can trip a safeguard and hand your request to a different model. Ask for the answer and the proof behind it, not a play-by-play.
Being clear, giving context, and showing an example still win. What flipped is the step-by-step hand-holding weaker models needed. Also: longer waits are normal on hard tasks — it's working, not stuck.
Take it with you
Run the skill in Opus or Sonnet and it writes a Fable-ready prompt for you — then you paste that into Fable 5. The cheat sheet is one page — print it, keep it by your screen.
No spam, ever.